Dimanche 11 décembre 2011 7 11 /12 /Déc /2011 16:32

The globalisation and the extraordinary technological progress of these past 30 years have change the rules forever, for everyone and for all developed countries.

Since his election at the Presidency of France (2007), Nicolas Sarkozy has driven a policy to deeply reform French Universities (link, link, link). The goal of his reform is to enhance the competiveness of French Universities and to bring them at the level of US and UK Universities. But his reform will also deeply impact and positively change the French economy and enhance the competitiveness of France.


image large-copie-1 

University Nice Sophia Antipolis

 

What is the Sarkozy's University reform? To make the story short, our Universities are becoming:

  • Independant from the Government policy and strategy concerning education & research choices.

  • « Autonomous ». They will freely establish their strategy and priorities. They will be allowed to partner with industrial companies and find other sources of funding than those provided by the French state and ministries. They will be free to hire and manage their human resources. The Universities will be the owner of their real estates and tangible assets (for example, at 2012, the University of Nice will be the owner of more than 1 billion euro real estate!).

 

Before the Sarkozy's University reform, French Universities were big public administrations having bureaucratic management, and working without interaction with the real economy.

After the reform, the Universities will be corporation-like organizations, with regular accountancy, with thousand of employees (Professors, Researchers, Engineers, Administrative and Management staff). These big corporation-like organizations will now completely change the economy and the rules of the game at the local regional level. The economic center of gravity of each French region will become its University.

 

At January 2011, 73 on 83 French Universities accepted to be autonomous, and at the beginning of 2012, 100% of Universities will be autonomous. The reform is also accompanied by an unprecedented financial commitment of the State: 50% increase in the budget for higher education over 5 years, a total of €16 billion of « additional » government funding for universities. 

 

Nicolas Sarkozy has launched an important investment plan of €35 billion, focused on:

- knowledge and intelligence (higher education and academic research), 16 billion

-  innovative industries, 19 billion (ex. 4.25 billion for digital economy)

http://investissement-avenir.gouvernement.fr/

 

 


The missions of French Universities before Sarkozy's reform:

  • Research and knowledge production

  • Knowledge transmission through scientific article publications and teaching to students

 

The missions of French Universities after Sarkozy's reform:

  • Research and knowledge production

  • Knowledge transmission through scientific article publication and teaching (to students)

  • Professionalisation of students (the goal is to enhance their employability)

  • Entrepreneurship and Innovation through applied scientific research and technology transfer into firms


 

Other organisations involved in the innovation process

French Universities are strongly linked to other organisations involved in the innovation process. The following organisations have also been strongly pushed and supported during the Sarkozy presidency:

 

Startup Incubators

- In France, we have 83 Universities, and each one has a Business Incubator dedicated to support the transfer of academic research and technology into spin-off startups. Each incubator holds around 100 technology-based startups (around 8000 startups are currently in our incubators!). We have startups having innovations coming from every academic and scientific fields (Formal Sciences, Physical Sciences, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Life and Medical Sciences ...).

 

As example, you can visit the website the Incubator of University Nice Sophia Antipolis, Incubator PACA-EST : http://en.incubateurpacaest.org/

 

- French Universities are also launching business incubators dedicated to their students. The need of launching incubators dedicated to students is very promising. Indeed, among the thousand students of each University, we could have several potential Mark Zukerberg (Facebook's founder-CEO) that have crazy dreams and wishing to change the world.

Of course, startups launched by University students are less technology-based compared to University spin-out startups backed by several years of scientific research. Nevertheless, the success and profitability of such new ventures based on “good ideas” could very high (Facebook, Goolge, eBay ...). 

Student-entrepreneurs wishing to launch their startups will have a strong support from the university’s academic resources (business training, expertise and mentoring from Professors) and facilities (laboratories and engineering for prototyping, business offices ...), and also from local expert such as CEOs and Managers of growing companies.

 

Incubators increase dramatically the percentage of success compared to startups without having had the support of an incubator. The incubation clearly diminishes the risk of failure.

- Without incubator: Over 50% of small businesses fail in the first year and 95% fail within the first five years (according to the US Small Business Administration)

- With incubator: 90% of new ventures are still alive and are operating 5 year after leaving the incubator.

 

Industrial Property Management firms

- Each University will also have an independent company only dedicated to the management and marketing of University industrial property (patents) and licensing negotiation to industrial companies. These management companies are named SATT (Sociétés d’Accélération du Transfert de Technologies). The SATTs will provide all the resources needed to favor the transfer of innovative technologies from the academic labs into firms.

 

For example :

Floralis

http://www.floralis.fr/ IP Management company of the University of Grenoble

ValorPACA

http://www.valorpaca.fr/ (wesite only in French) IP Management Association of Universities of the PACA region (Nice, Marseille and Aix-en-Provence). Valorpaca is not yet a SATT, but it will become one soon (and will be renamed SATT PACA Corse).

 

The SATTs are very efficient organisations because they are not an administrative department of University. Although SATTs investors and shareholders are public organisations (67% Universities, 33% French State through its Sovereign Wealth Fund), they are fully independent corporation having their own governance, management and staff, and at the opposite of public administrations, and like every corporation they have to be efficient and profitable.

The proof of the efficiency of SATTs is their annual financial statement. For example "Floralis", founded at 2009, Floralis has €1,500,000 capital stock (serious commitment of its shareholders), and presented at December 2010 a turn-over of €7,448,000 and a net income of €75,000!

http://www.score3.fr/UJF-FILIALE,452135452.ent

 

 

Technology Clusters

- In every French Region, there is also Technology-Cluster

A cluster join together in a given territory, industrial global firms, innovative SMEs & startups and research laboratories of Universities to develop synergies and cooperation.

The challenge is to build synergistic collaborative projects and to allow innovative companies involved to have access to facilities (subsidies, grants, tax reduction, infrastructure ...) and to take a leading position in their fields in France and abroad. Each Cluster is dedicated to a specific industrial field.

 

Here is the Government website dedicated to French Clusters (named Pole de Compétitivité in French) : http://competitivite.gouv.fr/poles-en-action/carte-des-poles-468.html

 

Tax Credit, Subsidies/Grants 

- Other support to companies having R&D and innovation activities : important Tax Credit for R&D investments done by companies, Payroll Tax reductions for young innovative startups, numerous Subsidies and Grants to support innovation projects of privately-held companies ...

 

 

To be continued ... 

Par Ari Massoudi
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Jeudi 22 septembre 2011 4 22 /09 /Sep /2011 16:26

"Open Peer Review"

vs

"Simple Blind Peer Review"


 

"Simple Blind Peer Review"

How does Science progess (or stagnate!)? Scientist researchers in Academic laboratories perform experimentations with the aim to discover new knowledges. This is their job!

How do Scientists decide if a finding is enough new and orginal to be considered as a new knowledge? Scientists have to write an article about their findings and discovery to make their findings known by other scientists. The article usually presents a defined structure, for example you can see one here. To make known their work, they have to choose a Scientific Journal and submitt their article for publication. When the article is published, it is available for all scientists in the world.

 

For scientists, publications are very important. Having published articles in Scientific journals validates a scientist as a scientist. And the prestige of the Scientific Journal in which articles are published is also a very important point for career progression in Academia.

A famous saying: "Publish or Perish!

 

There is numerous Scientific Journals, those focusing only on one subject (example Cancer research or Alzhiemer research), those being generalist, those being more for physician community, and those more for scientist community ... ect. The article is addressed to the Editor of the Journal. Here is the process:

- The Editor rejects the article because it is not enough in the focus of the journal, or for 1000 other reasons. Scientists should find another Journal to apply.

- The Editor accepts the submission. The trouble starts now!

The Editor will select some "expert" scientists working in the field of the article and ask them to review it. The number of people reviewing an article is usually 3 to 5. These reviewers are researchers who are not linked to the laboratory applying for the publication. The reviewers are "independent" and have to judge the article "objectively"! The second point is that the team who apply for a publication will never know the names of the reviewers. But the reviewers know the name of the scientists applying for a publication.

This system is called "Simple Blind Peer Review" (or also called Blind review or Peer review):

- Simple Blind, because only one side (reviewers) knows the identity of the other side 

- Peer means by people who are expert in the scientific field to be judged 

 

Reviewers can reject the article or accept to continue the review process under conditions. They can ask for slight modifications, such as modifications of the text, or they can ask for supplemental experiments with the goal to strengthen the conclusions of the article.

Scientists come back to the lab and perform asked modifications and experiments.

Reviewers can then definitively accept or reject the article. If they accept, the article will be published in the Scientific Journal and will be available for all scientists.

 

This evaluation process, Simple Blind Review, causes several ethical problems and is continuously subjected to the criticism of scientists:

 

- The process is time consuming:  it typically takes several months or even several years in some fields for a submitted paper to appear in print.

 

But the problem of being too slow is not the major problem of the Simple Blind Review!

"We know that the system of peer review is biased, unjust, unaccountable, incomplete, easily fixed, often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish, and frequently wrong." Richard Horton, editor of the prestigious medical journal The Lancet.


The interposition of editors and reviewers between authors and readers always raises the possibility that the intermediators may serve as gatekeepers. Some sociologists of science argue that peer review makes the ability to publish susceptible to control by elites and to personal jealousy and personal interests. The peer review process may suppress dissent discovery and findings against "mainstream" theories. Reviewers tend to be especially critical of conclusions that contradict their own views and theory, and lenient towards those that accord with them. At the same time, established scientists are more likely than less established ones to be sought out as referees, particularly by high-prestige journals or publishers. As a result, it has been argued, ideas that harmonize with the established experts are more likely to see print and to appear in prestigious journals than are iconoclastic or revolutionary ones. Adapted from Wikipedia

 

Another ethical problem is that mainly all Scientific Journals ask money to scientists to submit their work and extra-money to publish the article. These entry fees can be quite high and are unfair. Indeed, reviewers work for free, and with the internet we do not need anymore to read articles in paper format, and every researcher reads articles online. In addition, Scientific Journals ask also money to Universities, Research Institutions and anyone wishing to access to the full content of their journals, the online version! Subscriptions to Scientific Journals are amazingly high and totally unjustified! Scientific researches done by Academia are mainly funded by public grants, therefore the results of research are a Public Good! And the access to these results should not be blocked by "Journals" which are private companies!  (read more at this link)



More than 5,700 researchers have joined a boycott of Elsevier, a leading publisher of science journals: 

 http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/science/researchers-boycott-elsevier-journal-publisher.html?_r=3&src=me&ref=science

Join the revolution! http://thecostofknowledge.com/


 

Before the popularization and democratization of the internet, there was no solution or alternative to the Simple Blind Reviewing process, and the "Mafia of Scientific Journals"! But now, with the power of internet a new way of reviewing science discoveries has emerged, it is called Open Peer Review !

 

"Open Peer Review"

WebMed-Central-copie-1.gif

Hereafter, I would like to present the only one Online Biomedical Journal based on the Open Peer Review process:   WebmedCentral

http://www.webmedcentral.com


Webmed has been founded in 2011 in UK by a group of medical and management professionals with no affiliation to any major biomedical publishing group.

 

The process is very simple, scientists can submit their articles (or other scientific communications) by up-loading their files. The article is published under 48h, and then the review process will start by Peers. The review process is transparent and fair.

Watch these 2 videos presenting WebmedCentral:

 

 

 

WebMedCentral is a generalist online journal in biology and medical sciences. I bet that Online Scientific Journals based on Open Peer Reviewing Process will rapidly appear for formal sciences, physical sciences and chemistry, and even for human and social sciences!  

Par Ari Massoudi
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Vendredi 26 août 2011 5 26 /08 /Août /2011 12:00

I would like to present a very interesting web site based on a simple idea, but a very useful one:

Science Exchange

http://scienceexchange.com

 

Science Exchange is an online CtoC marketplace for outsourcing scientific experiments, from academic scientists to academic scientists (StoS). The goal is to make it easier for researchers to access core resources across institutions. Currently, the natural audience of Science Exchange is academic researchers, but the service will interest for sure researchers and engineers of companies having R&D activities, or even companies wishing to solve a problem with the help and support of academic scientists.

 

For example:

A scientist should perform an experiment to finish an article before submitting it to peer-reviewed journals, but he/she is not competent in a particular technique needed for the experiment, or the technology is not available in his/her lab, or just he/she has an urgent deadline.  

He/she is looking to outsource the experiment to other scientists at core facilities of major research universities who have the capacity to conduct the experiment. 

After registering in Science Exchange, the scientist can easily propose a proposal, and his peers can offer their services.


Here the screanshot after clicking on the "Find Projects" button:

Snap1-copie-4.jpg

 

Here the proposal details of a scientist who wishes to outsource an experiment. You can access to his profile and see where he's working (in which lab, and what is his position), you can ask him a question, and you can also send by email the proposal to scientits that could be interested by the task (by clicking on the "Promote This Proposal" button).    

Snap2-copie-1.jpg

 

 

The Co-founder and CEO of Science Exchange is Dr. Elizabeth Iorns, Cancer biologist researcher and Assistant-Professor at the University of Miami:

http://www.linkedin.com/in/elizabethiorns 

 

Par Ari Massoudi
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Vendredi 15 juillet 2011 5 15 /07 /Juil /2011 17:08

Professor Edison Liu, Executive Director of the Genome Institute of Singapore, talks about his teams work.

Cancer is a complex disease which is caused by multiple genetic and epigenetic changes. In addition, cancer is a genetic moving target capable of mutating into resistant or more aggressive forms. Prof Liu's team have employed a strategy of using genomic data to reconstruct systems maps of critical regulatory networks, identify critical nodes in the oncogenetic network and target them in order to induce cell death and cell differentiation. This genome-to-system approach was used to quickly uncover the complex mechanisms of action of a protein that induces the death of cancer cells but not in normal cells. Prof. Liu explains how genomic mapping will be used to decide patient eligibility for this treatment and notes that considering this therapy targets a process rather than a specific cancer; it will be useful when treating a number of different cancers.

 

Par Ari Massoudi
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Lundi 27 juin 2011 1 27 /06 /Juin /2011 11:42

Dans un monde de plus en plus complexe,  nos contemporains sont noyés sous un océan d’information, où la somme des connaissances disponible augmente de jour en jour, la formation efficiente des ressources humaines (acquisition de savoirs nouveaux, transformation des savoirs en connaissances, en compétences et en savoir-faire) est un enjeu majeur pour toutes les organisations qu’elles soient publiques ou privées.

Que cela soit pour la formation initiale (de l'enseignement primaire jusqu'au supérieur) ou pour la formation continue, le developpement des NTIC permet dans une certaine mesure de répondre à la problématique du transfert de savoir dans le contexte d’« infobésité » actuel. Ceci peut paraître paradoxal puisque c'est bien la révolution informatique et des NTIC qui est responsable de l'augmentation de la production et de la diffusion massive de l'information. C'est du mal que viendra le remède, le e-learning !

Le e-learning est l’action d’apprendre par l’ « intermédiaire » des ordinateurs, de logiciels dédiés (LSM Learning Management System) et du réseau internet.  

L’environnement informatique permet de réduire considérablement les couts de l’enseignement et de la formation sur le long terme. En effet, on peut enseigner à n’importe qui, n’importe où et n’importe quant, pourvu que les apprenants soient équipés. De plus, la possibilité de « scénariser » l’offre de formation en proposant à l’apprenant un parcours initiatique rend afin l’apprentissage « ludique ». Le cerveau humain est beaucoup plus receptive à l’acquisition de l’information quant ce dernier lui est présenté sous une forme narrative (principe du storytelling). Ainsi, l’efficience du transfert de savoir (taux de rétention, compréhention ...) est ainsi particulièrement augmentée.

Solunea est une société de conseil en ingénierie informatique spécialisée en E-Learning.

Solunea (www.solunea.fr) est une brillante start-up nîmoise créee en 2006 par Yann Lescurat (http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/yann.lescurat). Solunea a réalisé un chiffre d’affaire de 700k€ en 2009 et au vu de sa croissance, ambitionne de doubler ce chiffre d’ici à 2012.

Fort de son succès et de son savoir-faire, Solunea a séduit la firm américaine SABA avec laquelle elle a tissé un partenariat solide. SABA, multinationale spécialisée en management des ressources humaines, a été fondée par l’irano-américain Bobby Yazdani en 1997, et côtée au NASDAQ depuis 2000 (http://www.saba.com).

Mais justement, quel est ce savoir-faire qui rend Solunea si attractive ?

Solunea propose à toutes organisations, privés ou publiques, l’ingénierie et la réalisation d’outils d’e-learning « à façon » en interaction avec les équipes pédagoques du client, depuis l’élaboration du cahier des charges jusqu’à la livraison du e-produit.

Quelques exemples :

Patterns est un produit développé avec la participation du laboratoire de recherche LGI2P de l’Ecole des Mines d’Alès qui a pour ambition de fournir aux experts métiers et formateurs occasionnels un outil d’aide à la décision pendant la phase de conception pédagogique des actions de formation. Sous forme d’un « super-assistant », Patterns permet de guider les intervenants pendant l’étape de conception afin de garantir l’homogénéité et la qualité de cette étape. Patterns permet aux utilisateurs de récupérer en sortie le dossier de conception de leur formation au format Word.

Emulsion est l’outil auteur de Solunea qui permet d’assembler les ressources médiatiques (animations, photos, sons, documents, etc.) en modules de formation e-learning. L’approche innovante de Emulsion réside dans l’orientation collaborative de la démarche de production, permettant à différents intervenants de travailler à la réalisation de la même ressource de formation, tout en garantissant le niveau d’homogénéité et de qualité des réalisations. Solunea est le premier outil auteur a avoir une démarche d’industrialisation de la production des modules e-learning. Emulsion est aussi le premier outil à indexer l’ensemble des éléments médiatiques utilisés. Enfin, Emulsion propose des fonctionnalités puissantes permettant d’assurer la traçabilité des actions de production, grâce à des fonctionnalités de gestion de configuration.

Démonstration en ligne gratuite d'Emulsion le "Vendredi 1er juillet 2011 à 10H30" (Flyer), inscription ici http://www.solunea.fr/seminaires 

Communiqu-de-presse.jpg

Thaleia est un produit qui permet aux responsables de la production de ressources de formation de diffuser facilement ces ressources auprès de leurs utilisateurs relais, eux-mêmes en charge de la mise en ligne et de l’exploitation auprès des apprenants. Cet outil est notamment utilisé dans la génération d’outils de certification en ligne (questionnaires), afin de permettre aux différents décisionnaires de la diffusion des questionnaires (managers, maîtres d’ouvrage, filiales, etc.) de personnaliser les questions et les questionnaires en amont de leur diffusion aux apprenants. Ainsi, les manager peuvent vérifier à tout moment grâce à un outil en ligne, que les questionnaires dont ils disposent sont totalement à jour (et les regénérer dans le cas contraire), puis qu’ils correspondent précisément à leurs préoccupations en choisissant eux-mêmes les questions à exploiter ou les messages complémentaires à diffuser. Thaleia permet aussi de générer automatiquement des questionnaires à partir de modèles de questions et de simples fichiers Excel de définition. Générer des modules e-learning de questionnaires avec des centaines de questions n’a jamais été aussi simple et rapide !

Par Ari Massoudi
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires

Présentation

Recherche

Recommander

Syndication

  • Flux RSS des articles
Créer un blog gratuit sur over-blog.com - Contact - C.G.U. - Rémunération en droits d'auteur - Signaler un abus - Articles les plus commentés